| "The problem with using experience as a guide is that the final exam often occurs before the lesson" -- unknown |
LI
-220: Fiction & Human Experience
Spring, 2005,
Mondays, 6:00 – 8:50 P.M.
Instructor: Thomas M. Eaton
See
Links page
Office: 318-K, Grauel BLDG.
for
assignment sheets
Office Hours: 11-1:30 M/W
and
Learning assists
Office Phone: 651-2019, Home office,
339-1595
E-mail: tmeaton@semo.edu
Required Texts :
Pickering, J.: Fiction 100:
An Anthology of Short Fiction, (10th ed.) (university Bookstore
textbook rental)
Course Description:
LI- 220 is an introduction course meeting university standards off
general study. This course will introduce the student to the short story
construct of human experience. Students will be encouraged to aesthetically
evaluate the reading, apply and consider elements of social conditions within
the students’ own experiences as to gain ability in communicating supported
evaluative judgments contributing to leadership, citizenship and scholarly focus
on literary styles, trends and conditions.. LI-220 endorses a multicultural
approach, focusing on commonalities between humans rather than particular race
or cultural patterns. Students will develop analytical tools needed to become
well-rounded readers.
Design: This syllabus uses a thematic approach in accordance with the
Graduate English Association’s (2004) recommendations towards the thematic
approach in as means towards generating motivation.
Students are encouraged to make thematic connections between the texts
while still recognizing the cultural nuances or historicity behind the work.
Written assignments will demand critical analysis of daily universal experiences
and the application of composition tools to translate analytical thought into
formal and professional written responses. Tests will be of a multiple choice
venue, reinforcing knowledge blocks, variations and commonalities within themes,
and cultural and historic awareness of social backdrops of the literature.
General Outcomes:
-
identify and explain the fundamental features of the short story
structure as a means of demonstrating human experience.
-
Define key literary terms/concepts and implement these in
oral/written discussion as well as in literary interpretation.
-
Describe, examine, and
evaluate one’s own reading practices and oral/written critical analyses.
-
Analyze literature and explain how various perspectives of literary
work merge together to create meaning reflecting social and individual conflict.
-
Apply writing and revision as tools for personalizing literature as
life-demonstrations of actual human conditions thereby training students to
apply these cultural and individual situations in real life practice.
Specific Outcomes –
-
Familiarity with literature as a live active force demonstrating
human condition.
-
Develop interpretive, connective and descriptive analysis
techniques and translate those techniques through writing practices including
summarizing, extracting, engaging personal narrative involvement, comparing and
contrasting and challenging cause and effect relationships.
Requirements: (See
Advisor for eligibility)
Students are responsible for all course materials. Assignment sheets will be employed by the instructor and devices including e-mail and traditional mail will be used. However, it remains the students’ responsibility to keep up with all work.
Because of the developmental nature of this course, both in degrees of concept development and writing development, overall scoring is done holistically meaning a blend of statistical outcome and quantitative analysis within the following areas.
Formal papers ................................ ……………………= 40%
Participation - group discussion, In-class presentation……= 20%
Mid-term & Final Exam….........……………………… ..= 40%
This system allows for weaknesses in one area to be compensated by other areas. Absenteeism has been proven to be harmful to all of these areas. You are evaluated here much as you are on the job. Educating yourself is your job. Performance, behavior, initiative, contributions to coursework and preparedness all constitute this scoring method.
Closing: This
course rewards critical thinking, willingness to challenge and question readings
and respectful debate. It demands clear and concise writing practice in which
guidance will be supplied. It
invites and welcomes innovation and experimentation. This course does not reward
passivity, purposeful mediocrity, excuses, attitude or blame. You are encouraged
to use the Writing Center, 4th floor, Kent library. Should you do you, please
attach the yellow response form to your final submission.
Sixteen Week Schedule:
Legend:
Column 1 - gives you the week, column 2 indicates what will be discussed in each class. Column 3 will inform you of what is to be read for the following week and column 4 indicates assignments, presentations or group activities. NOTE: Group activities cannot be made up. T.E.
|
TIME FRAME |
OBJECTIVES |
APPLICATION |
ASSESSMENT |
|
Week 2 – 23-28 (no
class week 1 – MLK) |
Introduction to Course Syllabus -- Outline of basic literature terminology: four levels of man vs…
Analysis,
aesthetics, symbolism, allegorical draws, interpretation, conventional
drama design, six primary literary themes, and fiction as a mirror.
Introduction to part 1: Man vs. himself.
|
Barth’s Lost
in the Funhouse p.56 |
Focus Question:
“How does fiction represent isolation and the internal structure that
follows and how does this tie in to human experience of personal, racial,
ethnic, gender or economic “isolates”?” |
|
Week 3: Jan, 31- Feb 4. |
Man vs. self , conventional drama. Dual strand style, drama curve – Cup of Trembling: allegorical reference – proxemics of isolation. |
Melville’s Bartleby
the Scrivener, p. 952, Crane’s
The Blue Hotel, p.389 |
- Focus Question: How is it possible to be lonely in a crowd –
P.Narr. – explain the sensation. |
|
Week 4: Feb 7 - 11 |
Discussion and review questions on Bartleby & …Hotel. Focus on variations of social isolation and external response by others in the face of isolation reaction. |
Glaspell’s A Jury of Her Peers, p566 |
Focus Question: How does isolation engender external violence, internalized abuse, and hostility or curiosity by onlookers when you “take a stand.” |
|
Week 5: Feb 14-18
------------ Week 6 Feb 21- 25 |
Introduction
to man vs. Society: Elements include
incident, reaction, snowball effect of initial action, degree of which
mores and morals laws are affronted, unspoken delineations of racial,
gender, and ethnicity laws (morals not applied equally based on one of
these profiles). (singular oppression
– gender identification “Social rules of men). (opportunity to
question traditional values of masculine honor, feminine pride, racial
stereotyping, creed-based loyalty to “God-form” or ethnic loyalty in
all of the readings thus far. --- Discuss
the human experience as: Man
versus the social whole (universal themes of social violation) Man
vs. a social group (ethnic, racial or gender boundaries, specific reactive
group.) Man vs. a singular (social) representative (law man or social agent) |
Zora Neale Hurston’s Spunk” p. 675 John Cheever’s – The Country Husband 186-203 (These four stories complete the ------------ Sarah Orne Jewitt’s A White Heron, pp.761 |
In Class Group Discussion: - (Class to discuss and analyze voluntary ownership, contemporary relationship priorities and expectations. (that which is forbidden, that which is allowed, myths and misconceptions in contemporary relationships.– opportunity to note commonalities between traditional relationships and alternative relationships ) -------------------- Formal Writing 2: “To be the focus of social attention, either negative or positive, is the opposite of isolation. However, isolation can be a key ingredient in the distress associated with the attention. How can this contradiction exist?” |
|
Week 7, Feb 28 – Mar
4 |
Antlers:
Discuss the “fuzzy, wavering lines that separate man from the
animal”
Isolation
in nature -- social escapism through nature -- nature demanding social
ordering --- betrayal of
nature for personal gain, -- recognizing ecological mythical qualities in
relationship of man and animals. |
Thomas Hardy’s The Three Strangers, pp. 620 Stephen King: The man in the Black Suit, pp.832 |
Q&A on Social
paper, formal II Group
Focus: List at least five
conditions which separate man from the animals – (Use caution – I will
try to prove you wrong.) |
|
Week 8, Mar. 7-11 |
Nature as precursor to
doom – mood, nature as fear-inducing, embodiment of Eden or Hell –
spiritualism, ritual and “visitors” from natural/unnatural world.
(note syntactical variation (irony) in “natural” and “unnatural”
– terms of comprehension |
Mid-term Review –
Points of man vs himself, man vs. society, Man vs. nature --literary
terminology |
Formal II – Social
paper due |
|
Week 9, Mar. 13-17 |
SPRING BREAK |
Study for Midterm |
**** |
|
Week 10, Mar 21-25 |
Midterm Exam – Handout on Formal III – Nature. Film: |
Barthleme’s Cortez & Montezuma, pp p. 73. & O’Connor’s “A Good Man is Hard to Find” pp.1082 |
Midterm Exam Formal
Writing III Nature: Assigned “A continuing theme
in literature, especially evident in early mythology, states that as long
as man lives outside of nature he will be punished. In your analysis,
choose a position as to whether man is outside of nature and therefore can
control it or if man is a symbiotic part of nature and can only to be
subject to nature regardless of his abilities.” |
|
Week 11 – Mar 28 –Apr. 1 |
Man Vs. religion - )
Discussion of elements evident in the Man
vs. religion theme (punitive punishments, heightened epiphany senses –
(leading to divine interpretation –visions), motivational energies, fear
modification and inherent desire (Maslow’s Hierarchy introduction).
Continue discussion of religion conflict – tie in isolation,
societal pressures, and nature (doctrine - social) vs. (Myth – nature
sponsored).
|
Rayomond Carver’s Cathedral, pp.160 & K. Boyle’s Astronomer’s
wife pp. 118 |
Turn in Formal III Group exercise: answer this question and present: Question whether doctrine and myth are really the same, the former elements of truth overlaid with myth, the second, mythical components underlaid with truth.nt: |
|
Week 12 – April 4-8 |
(Discussion
of technology as religion, advanced civilization (including corruption)
interpreted as God-like – Man’s personification of God as himself.
(see Genesis). Consider discussion on this premise: Did God create man in
his own image or did man create God in his (man’s) own image?” –
Discuss religion-influenced social caste systems, naivety in the face of
danger, personifications and symbolism of evil and good.) End – man vs. religion |
Poe’s Fall of
the House of Usher, pp. 1135 & Cask of
Amontillado, p. 1129 |
Formal
Assignment 4 - “Both ecstasy and suffering are evidence of “faith” However, since man vs. religion incurs social, natural and internal (man vs. himself) conflict, is the relief from that conflict “divine” or a natural emotional result from a reduction in conflict.?” |
|
Week 13 – April 11-15 |
Introduction to Terror & Violence at motif in literature: Psychological emphasis, delineations between terror and violence (pleasurable vs.unpleasurable. Deviation studies, biophile and necrophile attractions – Good and evil question reconsidered. |
Bierce’s Occurrence
at & Dobyns’ |
Q&A on Formal Question 4 Group – Students are to list reasons why they like to be scared – Also, discuss reality television as a return to the roman “games” could it happen? |
|
Week 14 – April 18-22 |
Discussion of the dream sequence, subconscious mind, the slice-of-life vignette styling, terror/violence appeal allows for transitions in time not experienced in regular life. Self preservation, violence objectivity and subjectivity. |
& Updike’s Separating, p. p1293 |
Formal 4: Turn in Groups: Students to determine what love is. Also, each group to write one multiple choice question for the exam. |
|
Week 15 – April 25-29 |
Closing discussion on love: social determinants, moral obligation, romanticism and idealism |
General Q&A on nay of the issues |
Review for Final exam: Focus on issues of men vs. religion, terror and violence, and love |
|
Week 16 – May 2-7 |
Final Exam, Monday night, May 2 |
*********** |
************ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|